Books, blog and other blather

Category: South Korea (Page 13 of 13)

Requiem for a Cinema

One of Korea’s more famous, older cinemas, the Joongang, apparently closed on Monday (thanks to Darcy for pointing that out). Not a big surprise, I guess — its facilities were not the best, and the land under it, at the eastern edge of Myeongdong in downtown Seoul, is way too valuable. But there are not many theaters left in Seoul with any history anymore, so the end of the Joongang is something of a sad thing.

Joongang cinema

The Joongang was built in 1966 by the Byucksan Group. For most of its history, it was a second-string theater, showing movies after they had already played at the nicer cinemas in town. But in 1998 it was renovated, and turned into a multiplex, giving a new lease on life.

Like a lot of older, less popular cinemas in Seoul, the Joongang became a popular place for press screenings, so I used to go there a lot. I can remember seeing THE TWO TOWERS there, as well as OSEAM, GANGS OF NEW YORK, and many other films before the rest of the world got to see them. I think the last preview I saw there was a special screening of Hong Sangsoo’s NIGHT AND DAY (which was followed by typically Hong levels of drinking afterward).

(Note: To read about the closing of the last single-screen, old-style theater in Seoul, the Dream Cinema, you can click here).

I talked a bit about the Joongang in POP GOES KOREA. It is a story I told to illustrate the dysfunctional way movie distribution used to work in Korea, about the famous Korean producer Shin Chul, and the fight he had with the Joongang back in 1994 over his movie THE 101ST PROPOSITION and JURASSIC PARK. In honor of the theater’s memory, I will reprint that story here:

Back in 1994, one of downtown Seoul’s most important theaters, the Joongang Cinema, signed a deal with ShinCine Communications to distribute their film The 101st Proposition. The deal called for the Joongang to play the film a minimum number of weeks, with the exception that, should attendance drop below 1,500 people per day, the cinema could put in something else.
That same year, the film everybody wanted to see was Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park. The Joongang owner, like all other theater owners in Korea, was eager to get such an obvious blockbuster onto its screen. The 101st Proposition, however, was still under contract, and its attendance was not dropping below the lower limit of 1,500 people. At the time, even the biggest movies rolled out on few screens, usually just fifteen to twenty in the entire nation. In Seoul, a movie would show in only one or two theaters, so it took a long time for everyone who wanted to see a film to get in. With this much business at stake, getting the blockbuster of the year was a financial bonanza.
So the management at the Joongang took action. First they pulled their ads and promotions for The 101st Proposition, and attendance dropped a little. Next, the theater hired some thick-necked goons to stand out front to intimidate customers and prevent them from buying tickets. It did not take long for the film’s production company ShinCine to find out about this, but what could they do?
Luckily, ShinCine had good ties with many young progressives willing to stand up for Korean movies. Even in the 1990s, progressives in Korea were used to taking their lumps from the people in charge (be they government or private industry). Plenty of producer Shin Chul’s friends had recently gotten work as schoolteachers around the city, so a friend called up the teachers and invited them to bring their students to see the movie.
To further vex the Joongang, one person went to the bank and changed his regular won to thousands and thousands of one-won coins—each worth about one-tenth of a cent, still legal tender, although not in general circulation. With movie tickets costing about 4,000 won each, that added up to a lot of coins.
The students came to see the movie, carrying great bags of one-won coins, much to the consternation of the thick-necked gentlemen and their employer. By this point, the whole mess had turned into an event. The goons tried intimidating the schoolkids, which led to plenty of shrieking and mayhem. Other progressive friends of ShinCine came down to support the drive, such as the well-known and always politically inclined actor Moon Sung-keun (who also starred in the film). Moon stood on a chair, shouting out the importance of Korean culture and Korean movies, the need for the screen quota, and similar credos. The Joongang management called the protestors communists. It was chaos.
In the end, the Joongang got its Jurassic Park. Worried that the situation was escalating and that someone could get hurt, ShinCine’s owner/producer Shin Chul asked producer Lee Tae-won (then the top producer in Korea) to intervene. Lee negotiated with the Joongang Cinema, and they decided that the dinosaurs would get to play. In exchange, Shin was promised a prime slot for one of his movies the following summer.

Ha-Ha-Having the Last Laugh

Wow. Hong Sangsoo’s latest film, HA HA HA, has just won the top prize in the Un Certain Regard section at the Cannes Film Festival.

Hong has been to Cannes before, but it always seemed to me that his films usually got some pretty mediocre reviews. I am rather surprised that he pulled off the big win for this year. Good for him.

I have not seen HA HA HA yet. Derek Elley said it was not as good as his last film, SO YOU THINK YOU KNOW IT ALL … but Hong strikes me as one of those directors who is remembered more fondly than he is appreciated. It seems like each new film gets mixed reviews, while the critics claim that his earlier films were better (David Cronenberg is the king of that condition).

Anyhow, big congratulations to Hong. I am looking forward to seeing HA HA HA before too long.

Oh, you can see a trailer (with English subtitles) for his new movie here.

Seoul Foreign Correspondents Club — Not So Big on Journalism

Now that I have had this confirmed, I would like to say I am appalled by the Seoul Foreign Correspondents Club’s latest example of non-journalism — they did indeed turn down a request by their members to have Samsung whistleblower Kim Yong-chul address the Club.

The SFCC is no stranger to betraying journalistic principles for cowardly political reasons. Back in 2005, it turned down an offer to have the Premiere of Taiwan, Chen Shui-bian, talk to the Club in a video conference call (thanks to the club’s 2nd vice president, a journalist from China). The SFCC members were upset enough they added regulations to the bylaws to prevent that sort of thing from happening again. But I guess Club rules do not count for much.

Whatever you think of the merits of Kim assertions, his book Think Samsung is a big deal. It has sold over 120,000 copies, despite being almost completely ignored by the local press. Here are the key points from Choe Sang-hun’s article in the New York Times:

Mr. Kim joined the company in 1997 after making his name as a star prosecutor who investigated the corruption of Chun Doo-hwan, the former military strongman. He became Samsung’s top legal counsel before quitting in 2004. He went public with his allegations of wrongdoing three years later.

Even for South Koreans accustomed to corruption scandals, his assertions were staggering.

Mr. Kim accused Mr. Lee and his loyal aides of having stolen as much as 10 trillion won, or $9 billion, from Samsung subsidiaries and stashed it in stock and bank accounts illegally opened in the names of executives.

The book alleges that they shredded books, fabricated evidence and bribed politicians, bureaucrats, prosecutors, judges and journalists, mainly to ensure that they would not stand in the way of Mr. Lee’s illegal transfer of corporate control to his only son, Lee Jae-yong, 41.

In his book, Mr. Kim depicts Mr. Lee and “vassal” executives at Samsung as bribing thieves who “lord over” the country, its government and media. He portrays prosecutors as opportunists who are ruthless to those they regard as “dead” powers, like a former president, but subservient to and afraid of Samsung, which he calls the “power that never dies.”

I cannot imagine this sort of thing happening at the Foreign Correspondent Clubs in Tokyo or Hong Kong.  Those clubs actually look out for the needs of foreign correspondents first and take journalism seriously.  Indeed, local journalists in Japan sometimes use foreign reporters to break news that is considered too sensitive for the local press (especially stories involving the royal family).

On the plus side, apparently the SFCC members are mostly pretty upset about what happened, so hopefully something will be done. But the SFCC board has done this sort of thing before, and I fear that they will do it again, the next time a difficult topic comes up.

UPDATE: Looks like some SFCC members are taking things into their own hands and organizing a Kim Young-chul event on their own. Event is supposed to be this Wednesday (May 19)  at 5pm. Email opensfcc@gmail.com if you would like to attend.

Korea Vs. the LA Times

Very strange post on the LA Times’ Big Picture movie blog (thanks to The Marmot for finding this) — it talks about why Korea is getting IRON MAN 2 before Japan, saying that it is mostly because of Korea’s high rates of online piracy.

0002ironman2_poster

I say strange because I have no idea why Korea is getting singled out. IRON MAN 2 was released in over 50 territories last weekend, all over the world. Day-and-date releases from Hollywood are increasingly the norm, and have been unremarkable for quite some time.

Big Hollywood films, especially those released in the May-June area, have usually been released in Korea at the same time as in the United States for years now. Korea usually saves up its big blockbusters for later in the summer, in July and August, often causing Hollywood films to move their opening dates to avoid the biggest Korean films then. But May is the biggest time of the year for Hollywood in Korea.

That said, even films that get a delayed release can do well. MAMMA MIA! was released in Korea two months after it was in the United States and much of the West, but it made $25 million in Korea and was the fifth-biggest film of 2008. Sure, Korea has a lot of online and offline piracy, but perhaps the situation is more nuanced (and profitable) than some people would like to bellyache.

I especially dislike media executives complaining about online piracy without any comment about what their RESPONSIBILITIES are. Like they can hold on to their movies, music, TV shows or whatever and release them whenever they want. Sorry, but this is the Internet age, and if you do not give customers a fair chance to buy your content, they are not going to wait patiently for you to release something when you feel like it. Yes, consumers need to respect copyright. But producers also have a responsibility to make sure their content is available in a timely, convenient manner.

The LA Times would have been much better off asking the more interesting question — Why is Japan still releasing so many movies so much later than the rest of the world? The Japan market is the unusual one that needs an explanation, not Korea.

(And in case you are interested, the reason Hollywood films are released so much later in Japan has more to do with its tricky theatrical market than its respect for copyrights. In Japan, it can be hard to book screens, hard to market movies, there is relatively low theatrical attendance for the country’s population, high ticket prices and a whole host of difficulties.)

(Note: Cross-posted at Korea Pop Wars).

Fashioning Korean Fashions

A very interesting article in the New York Times today on Seoul Fashion Week and the trends and big ideas in Korean fashion in general. The general theme of the article is on how style in Korea is so different between men and women — men being elegant, women being very girlie. I am not sure if I agree, but it is definitely a good read.

Some choice bits:

Once you get past the bright-colored girlie girls, what really stands out in Seoul is the chic, bordering on the obsessively refined, look of the Korean young men, from college kids and young professionals in their early 20s to men in their 40s.

I really like this quote from fashion blogger Hong Sukwoo:

“Young Koreans haven’t found their own style yet, so they’re copying images they find on the Internet,” he says. “It’s a form of stylish cosplay.”

Hong Sukwoo on Korea's style divide

Hong Sukwoo on Korea's style divide


And then there was this comment from fashion designer Juun J.:

“There needs to be a revolutionary generation of women’s designers to come out and lead women into something new,” he said. “Designers in their early 20s are still learning, and they’re the ones who will do it.”

Johnny Hates Jazz - from Seoul Fashion Week

Johnny Hates Jazz - from Seoul Fashion Week


As someone who remembers Korea in the mid-1990s, honestly I do not find Korea’s rise in the fashion world that surprising. Even if the clothes and general style were not so hip back in the day, even then Koreans put a lot of energy and thought into their appearance. And from time to time, when I met students who were studying fashion (usually in Daegu), they were invariably much more interesting than the average Yonsei or Seoul National University egghead.

How much did the rise of Korean pop culture lead the fashion industry and how much did it follow? Or was it even caused by the fashion industry? I will let braver (and more fashionable) people than myself offer their theories. I suspect the two are intertwined.

But the biggest plus of these changes, in my humble opinion, is how the rise of fashion has led to diversity. Sure, Korea remains one of the most incredibly trendy places for fashion I have ever seen (from Burberry coats of the late 1990s to the mushroom hairdos of a year or two ago). But you do see a lot more variety than you used to. Beauty may be only skin deep, but individuality goes to the core.

* * *
As long as I am on the subject of style in Korea, I really should point out the great magazine GRAPHIC. It has been around since 2006, but last year it went bilingual. Sadly, you cannot download the magazine online, but you can buy it online and have it shipped to you.

If you are looking for a sign of how far Korean design has come, GRAPHIC magazine is really revealing. Tellingly, it is an independent magazine, without government money or major sponsors (which are usually behind the curve on art and culture, and rarely really “get it”). Plus it is just a great magazine for anyone interested in typography and graphic design.

Globalizing Hollywood – Doing It Right and Doing It Wrong

Two very interesting examples of Hollywood’s approaches to globalization in the news recently, one very smart and positive, one achingly stupid. But I think the two symbolize the good and the bad of how media companies are trying to figure out the future of their businesses.

First, the good. From Variety, an article about how Fox has been stepping up its international productions (behind the world’s most useless paywall). Through a division called Fox International Productions (creative name), Fox has been producing and co-producing movies in Spain, Germany, China, Russia, India and more. Why did Fox become so enthusiastic about international productions? The article quotes Fox International Productions president Sanford Panitch:

“The weekend the movie [JUMPER] opened, I remember getting an email from Fox Korea, where the film was one of the highest openings ever. But we were still No. 2 for the weekend. I thought, ‘How is that possible?’ Sure enough, a local Korean film, ‘The Chaser,’ was No. 1,” said Panitch.

So Panitch and Fox started to look all over the world, particularly in markets with strong local movies:

One of his first deals: He signed with “Chaser” director Hong-jin Na to direct Korean local-language production “The Yellow Sea.”
Panitch constantly watches videos of foreign movies, and often touches base with Fox’s network of foreign offices (there are 28 in all). He’s primarily focused on territories where local films dominate, such as India, Japan, France, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Italy and the U.K. He’s particularly focused on Italy these days. “I’m on the road a lot. I’m home from Hong Kong on Thursday, and leave for Russia on Sunday. I was in Japan every six weeks for a year. I’ve gotten these terrific development people,” Panitch says.

Which I think is great. Over and over again, countries that have strong local movie industries tend to have strong overall film industries. Look at Korea, where foreign movies went from 75 percent of the market to less than 50 percent over the past decade (sometimes under 40 percent). But over that same period, the Korean movie market more than quadrupled; Hollywood does not dominate Korea anymore, but it makes a lot more money now. So if Hollywood wants to help spur local production, I think that is a positive thing for everyone.

And now the bad. Or, rather, the very, very stupid. Hollywood is threatening to stop distributing DVDs in Spain because of all the online piracy over here. Yes, some people’s solution to piracy is actually to make their product harder to access legitimately.

The similarities with Korea are quite interesting. Says this LA Times article:

Spain is on the verge of becoming the second country in which piracy has ravaged what was once a robust business. In 2008, the last of the major studios shut down their operations in South Korea for the same reason.

In addition, online piracy is not against the law in Spain unless it is done for profit, very similar to the position the courts in Korea have taken repeatedly over the years. And, surprise surprise, neither country has an iTunes store, making it all the more difficult to watch movies online legitimately.

But the big lesson Korea teaches is that people ARE completely willing to buy content online when given the opportunity and the right business models. Koreans have been spending more money for online music than offline for five or six years now. However, media companies cannot expect to continue as before. As the Internet Manifesto states, “Tradition is not a business model” (declaration No. 12).

In short, if you want to succeed in the modern age of the Internet and globalization, you need to localize and you need to adapt. Neither bludgeoning nor whining get you anywhere.

Newer posts »

© 2024 Mark James Russell

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑